|
|
From RHEUMA21
http://www.rheuma21st.com

FIBROMYALGIA, CHRONIC PAIN AND TRAUMA CONFERENCE
Reported by Andrei Calin, MD, FRCP,
Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, England
Published 11. June 2001
About 200 delegates from around the world attended what turned out
to be a fascinating and superbly organised 3-day workshop on
Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain, and Trauma, held May 15-17, 2001, in
Bristol, UK. The workshop was organised by Bernie Rowe, an
attorney with Lyons Davidson Solicitors in Bristol. One was
immediately struck by the absence of any hidden agenda. If one
puts a number of articulate individuals in the same room and
focuses on the world literature in terms of trauma, and more
particularly whiplash injuries, and the ensuing outcome in terms
of return to normality or fibromyalgia/chronic pain, one is likely
to be able to reach something of a consensus. Of course, we did
not. But having said that, we did have an excellent opportunity to
focus on the different schools of thought and opinions in this
intricate field.
Although organised by a lawyer, the vast majority of speakers and
perhaps half the audience were medical. Most of the world's major
players in fibromyalgia, whiplash, and the resulting litigation
were present.
The firm of Lyons Davidson is somewhat unusual -- at least in the
British setting -- as they work both for Plaintiff and Defence in
personal injury claims and other areas. Thus, in house they have
a clear balance of views and the invited speakers reflected this,
with opinions ranging from one end of the spectrum to the other.
TYPICAL DEFENDANT’S ATTACK AGAINST CLAIM THAT WHIPLASH INJURY
RESULTED IN FIBROMYALGIA
Brian Barr, a claimant’s lawyer, summarised the typical
defendant’s attack against the claim that a whiplash injury
resulted in fibromyalgia, by stating that some lawyers and some
physicians simply do not believe in fibromyalgia.
Of course, this was a theme throughout the 3 days. However, the
vast majority of the audience believed in fibromyalgia, although
many were less impressed by the apparent high prevalence of
fibromyalgia following the traumatic episode/road traffic accident
(RTA).
This lawyer made the point that a video can show the patient
looking perfectly healthy. This may be misleading because the day
before or the day after the video was taken the subject may have
been in bed, exhausted, and in pain. I have to admit that I am not
convinced that patients with fibromyalgia have perfect days
interspersed with days when they feel ill. However, I am not sure
if there is a consensus on that point.
In the old days, we used to think that litigation was a much
bigger problem in Britain than in the United States, but this is
no longer the case. For example, we heard about a woman who had
recently won £1.25 million for an RTA-induced whiplash followed by
fibromyalgia.
One theme related to the gap between the initial RTA and the onset
of fibromyalgia. How short must the gap be? If the individual
develops widespread body pain more than 6 months after the RTA,
can this still be linked to the RTA?
Needless to say, there was a battle during the 3 days regarding
the relevance of tender points in fibromyalgia and frequent
mention was made of epidemiologic studies revealing, for example,
that up to 10% of asymptomatic schoolchildren are found to have
more than 11 out of 18 tender points when examined. This issue,
of course, led to discussions regarding exaggeration and even
malingering.
Mark White, Executive Director of the Physical Medicine and
Research Foundation in British Columbia, Canada, spoke as a
patient about the disease, litigation following an RTA, and his
own experience in this area. For example, he summed up the long,
drawn out litigation period by asking, "How can I get better when
I have to prove that I am sick?" He described how his stress was
bound to increase during the litigation process. The
inevitability of having to prove that one is more disabled than
reality in order to receive benefits was discussed.
Another patient, Beryl Baxter from Bournemouth, England, spoke
about how she found it helpful to keep a daily journal to define
the relationship between varying symptoms and external influences.
As I heard this, I was aware that as a rheumatologist I find
diary keeping to be total anathema, as it would seem to
concentrate introverted feelings around one’s everyday symptoms,
which can hardly benefit the individual. However, Richard Mayou,
Professor of Psychiatry, Oxford University, explained how this can
be used in a positive way, once one appreciates which factors are
likely to be associated with deterioration.
Matthew Avery, who works in the Motor Insurance Repair Research
Centre at Thatcham, England, pointed out that whiplash injuries
are more likely to occur now than they did a decade ago. In
essence, this relates to "improved" vehicle design, and in
particular vehicle stiffness, which decreases damage to the car
but may well increase damage to the occupant.
He stated that, "vehicle design, in particular vehicle stiffness,
head restraint geometry, and seat yield strength all play a role
in injury and its severity". He also spoke about the evolving
research that began by noting the lack of biofidelity with the
traditional "hybrid 3" dummy, which has now been replaced by the
more physiological "bioRID". Apparently, this more accurately
reproduces the complex kinematics of the human occupant involved
in rear-end shunts. It did seem encouraging to know that there is
an international insurance whiplash prevention group organised by
insurers and car manufacturers.
Avery summarised, "the crash performance of these two vehicles (a
1990 and a 2000 model) display a marked contrast. The latter
manages the energy of the impact more effectively than the former,
through the use of a very stiff vehicle structure together with
softer sacrificial components thus preventing more severe damage
and leading to a reduction in repair costs. However, this very
increase in efficient energy management leads to corresponding
increase in acceleration levels for the vehicle’s occupants.
Therefore, the whiplash protection performance of the latter
vehicle must be considerably enhanced to offer the same level of
protection as that of the older car."
Avery asked whether it is possible to engineer-out injury but
still have good low-speed performance. Happily, the answer
appears to be yes. We all await this Utopic car!
REVIEW OF FIBROMYALGIA
Robert Bennett, from Oregon Health Sciences University, reviewed
fibromyalgia from start to finish. He reminded us of the l990
criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia but admitted to
the inevitable tautology. Physicians interested in this area put
forward their typical patients, and defined the situation of these
difficult patients as having typical fibromyalgia -- all with 11
or more of the 18 tender sites. He reminded us that the tender
sites must involve three or more of the four quadrants of the
body. Furthermore, there must be axial areas of tenderness
including the neck, anterior chest, and lower back. The 11 points,
rather than 10 or 12, came from the receiver operating curve
(ROC), which plotted the true positive ratio against a
false-positive ratio in terms of establishing the best sensitivity
and specificity of the number of points.
In terms of the prevalence of fibromyalgia, women outnumber men by
a factor of almost 10:1, with up to 8% or 9% of women in the 7th
decade suffering with this condition.
Of course, widespread pain is even more prevalent in the general
population, with some 20% of women over the age of 50 having
widespread pain, a figure significantly higher than that for
fibromyalgia. The difference is that if tender points are also
found in those with widespread pain, then the diagnosis changes!
There is also a weak correlation between increasing number of
tender points, level of fatigue, and psychologic distress.
IS FIBROMYALGIA MORE LIKELY TO FOLLOW WHIPLASH INJURIES THAN LOWER
LIMB FRACTURES?
Dan Buskila, Professor of Medicine from Soroka Medical Centre,
Beer Sheva, Israel, reviewed his now famous (or infamous) paper
suggesting that fibromyalgia is more likely to follow whiplash
injuries than lower limb fractures. He was gracious enough to
admit that there were many problems inherent in his study,
beginning with the problems relating to the l990 criteria in terms
of diagnosis, i.e., no gold standard, the criteria are circular,
pain is a continuum and doesn’t have a sudden start and stop,
evaluating tender points is subjective both from the patient's and
physician’s point of view, there is potential for abuse in terms
of tender point criteria, etc, etc). He pointed out that Smythe
in l989 originally speculated that trauma could precipitate
fibromyalgia. Buskila then quoted Greenfield et al in Arthritis &
Rheumatism l992 who suggested that 23% of patients with
fibromyalgia had identified a specific precipitating event.
In his own study (published in Arthritis & Rheumatism l997) he
focused on 102 subjects with a neck injury and 59 who had had leg
fractures, and assessed them 1 year later. Intriguingly, 22% of
those with neck injury developed "fibromyalgia" compared to 2% of
those with lower extremity fractures. However, the unusual aspects
of this study related to the fact that all were in full-time
employment at 12 months. When he reviewed the unpublished data 3
years later, of the 11 men and 9 women who had fibromyalgia at 12
months, only one of the 11 men was still symptomatic at follow up,
compared to all 9 of the women. Nevertheless, all were in
full-time work, even at this stage. He commented on the link
between fibromyalgia and the social and political issue. It was
noted that fibromyalgia had developed at a mean of 3.2 months
after the trauma.
Buskila fully accepts that there is potential tautology in terms
of their study findings. Specifically, most of the tender points
are around the neck and shoulders, which is where whiplash
symptoms reside. Thus, it is very easy for a patient with whiplash
symptoms to have "fibromyalgia." In terms of a lower limb injury,
it is difficult to have symptoms around the neck and shoulders!
Buskila also suggested that there may be a relationship between
neck injury, cervical spine pain, nocturnal pain, and sleep
disturbance, and, therefore, fibromyalgia. In his conclusion, he
suggested that trauma may cause fibromyalgia, but fibromyalgia
does not necessarily cause work disability. Clearly, what works in
Israel may not be extrapolated to other countries.
DURATION OF WHIPLASH SYMPTOMS
Gordon Bannister, Orthopaedic Surgeon, Bristol, England, reviewed
his series of descriptive studies focusing on the duration of
whiplash symptoms following rear end shunts. I am always concerned
about these studies that fail to have a population control group.
Because chronic neck pain has a prevalence of 10% to 20% in the
general population, it is difficult to know whether his data have
any real meaning without adequate controls.
PSYCHIATRIC ISSUES OF FIBROMYALGIA
Richard Mayou, from Oxford University, discussed the psychiatric
issues focusing on whether compensation issues themselves may be
determinants of the severity of symptoms either relating to the
role of conscious simulation and exaggeration or malingering. He
focused on the evidence for the interaction of physical,
psychologic, and social factors in the full range of pain
syndromes, stressing how medico-legal bewilderment and acrimony
are powerful factors for maintaining individual disability and
distress. He spoke of the individual vulnerability and beliefs in
terms of personality, mental state, expectations and meaning, and
the social circumstances relating to life’s stresses, quality of
life, vulnerability of work, other interests, financial situation,
and inter-personal reactions. In terms of fibromyalgia and other
functional syndromes, which include irritable bowel disease,
chronic fatigue, tension headaches, non-cardiac chest pain,
environmental allergy, Gulf War Syndrome, etc, he pointed out that
the evidence does not support validity of specific syndromes, but
rather these labels reflect history, specialist clinical
experience, and lay pressure groups. He showed how medical care
itself can reinforce misinterpretation, confusion, and the
subjective impression of discomfort.
Mayou concluded that several major issues related to pre-accident
vulnerability and nature of the accident itself in terms of how
frightening it was, the severity of the injury, the amount of
post-accident distress, and finally the pessimistic beliefs of the
patient as well as the medical, legal, and financial issues that
ensue.
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PERSISTENT PAIN
A theme throughout the meeting related to the epidemiology of
persistent pain. There appears to be a consensus that 20% or more
of primary care attenders have chronic pain, and a large
percentage of these have relatively widespread pain.
In terms of the psychosocial aspects of whiplash, the "innocent"
nature of the car occupant was stressed. The driver in the
offending car virtually never gets whiplash injury, rugby players
don’t get whiplash injuries, and drivers in "dodgem" cars don’t
get whiplash injuries.
Anthony Dickenson, Professor of Neuropharmacology at University
College, London, stressed that a l998 WHO study suggested that the
prevalence of long-term pain is about 22% in a survey of more than
a dozen countries. He spoke about the mechanisms of inflammatory
neuropathic pain being different from acute pain. Dickenson
focused on the plasticity that occurs in both the transmission and
modulating systems in prolonged pain states, adding that
plasticity occurs at both peripheral and central sites. In terms
of central excitatory systems, interaction between peptides and
excitatory amino acids are critical for pain transmission from
peripheral nerve to the spinal cord and to the brain. He
explained how release of peptides and their receptor actions
allows the NMDA (N-methyl D-aspartate) channel receptor for
glutamate to be activated. Activation of this NMDA receptor
underlies "wind-up," whereby the baseline response is amplified
and prolonged even though the peripheral input remains the same.
This increased responsivity of dorsal horn neurones is probably
the basis for central hypersensitivity. We were introduced to
future pharmacologic possibilities that would have an impact on
NMDA receptor antagonism, calcium channel blockade that would
affect transmitter release, and neuronal excitability.
Although Dickenson suggested that in fibromyalgia N-type and
P-type calcium channels may be more active after nerve or tissue
injury, we do not have any clear evidence that there really is
nerve or tissue injury in these conditions.
BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MODEL OF FIBROMYALGIA
Dr Chris Main from Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester, England,
focused on the biopsychosocial model to explain the link between
pain and trauma. As a psychologist, he focused on the
inter-relationship between sensory awareness, cognitive,
affective, and other psychologic components, illness behaviour,
and the social environment. He concluded that we have paid a
heavy price for our over-reliance on disease models of illness. We
need to focus more on the biopsychosocial influences, because all
pain has both a peripheral and a central component, pain
influences function and our dysfunction is influenced by our
thoughts, feelings, and behaviour.
PRECIPITANTS OF FIBROMYALGIA
Goldenberg, from Tufts University School of Medicine, spoke about
the various factors that have a putative role in precipitating
fibromyalgia, including flu-like viral illnesses, physical trauma,
emotional trauma, and medication. He focused on the interface
between so-called chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia and
the various rheumatologic disorders said to be associated with
fibromyalgia, such as rheumatoid disease, systemic lupus,
Sjogren’s syndrome, and other conditions. The inter-relationships
between physical trauma, emotion, infection, endocrine
abnormalities, neurochemical changes, nociceptive changes, sleep
disturbance, tissue hypoxia, pain, fatigue, and depression were
explored.
In terms of basic research, Goldenberg spoke of the
neuro-endocrine, peripheral, and central pain regulation,
autonomic changes, circadian rhythm, and genetic susceptibility.
Ongoing NIH funded research is focusing on neurogenic dysfunction,
the role of neurotropins in an animal model of fibromyalgia, and
the neurobiology of chronic muscle pain, together with
neuro-endocrine alterations in fibromyalgia and irritable bowel
syndrome, exercise-induced changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary
axis, and the recognised abnormalities of regional cerebral blood
flow in the thalamus and caudate nucleus in those with low pain
thresholds.
Goldenberg suggested that certain data argue for impaired ability
to activate the hypothalamic pituitary portion of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in fibromyalgia, together with
abnormalties in the sympatho-adrenal system leading to reduced
ACTH and epinephrine responses to hypoglycaemia.
REPETITIVE STRAIN SYNDROME
Several presenters spoke about the past epidemic of so-called
repetitive strain syndrome that had plagued Australia until the
late l980s. Many of us questioned the possibility that
fibromyalgia would follow the same pathway.
Daniel Clauw, the Scientific Director of the Chronic Pain and
Fatigue Research Center in Washington, DC, at Georgetown Medical
Center, reviewed animal studies of stress, neurobiology of stress
response, stress and fibromyalgia, and other issues. Again we
were reminded about the epidemiology of chronic symptoms in the
general population. For instance, tension headaches occur in about
70% of women and 50% of men, while migraine affects 18% of women
and 3% of men followed by irritable bowel syndrome occurring in
20% of women and 15% of men, chronic fatigue in 20% of women and
12% of men, regional pain syndromes in more than 20% of women and
more than 15% of men, and chronic widespread pain in 12% of women
and 8% of men. The overlap between fibromyalgia and the so-called
exposure syndromes following Gulf War illness, silicone breast
implants, and sick-building syndrome and the various somatoform
disorders affecting more than 4% of the general population,
chronic fatigue syndrome, and the multiple chemical sensitivity
syndromes was discussed.
He showed us how the Gulf War syndrome is no different than the
clinical situation after many other stressful situations,
particularly when politics and economics colour the issues. In
summary, Clauw reported that $150 million have been spent on
research relating to the Gulf War experience. Moreover, the
veterans' symptoms were exactly the same as those seen in the
general population and have been noted in every war in which the
United States has been involved. There was no evidence of any
specific exposures leading to specific symptoms.
NEUROCHEMISTRY OF PAIN IN FIBROMYALGIA
Jon Russell, from the University of Texas, spoke on the
neurochemistry of pain in fibromyalgia, reviewing what we know
about substance P nerve growth factor, C-terminal fragment of
substance P, excitatory amino-acids, serotonin, norepinephrine,
opioids, N-terminal fragment of substance P, and other chemicals.
Substance P in fibromyalgia is said to be normal in serum,
plasma, and saliva but elevated in spinal fluid, as it is in
diabetes.
Cytokine studies in fibromyalgia suggest that IL-8 and IL1Ra and
IL-6 are increased. Abnormalities in serotonin and other
neuropeptides were reviewed.
TRAUMA AND FIBROMYALGIA
Chris Moran, from Bournemouth, England, reviewed his experience
with trauma and fibromyalgia, suggesting that it is between 6 and
12 weeks after the RTA that the systemic features develop in the
typical situation.
Robert Bennett, from the Oregon Health Sciences University,
Portland ,Oregon, provided objective findings in fibromyalgia. He
discussed the sensory thermal testing studies, the elevated CSF
levels of neurotransmitters, enhanced somatosensory potentials,
abnormal brain scans, abnormal sleep EEGs, abnormal sympathetic
function, and disregulated hormonal secretion. Apparently, brain
scan findings in fibromyalgia are said to be similar to those
found in other chronic pain states. Specifically, fibromyalgia
subjects have reduced thalamic blood flow, increased anterior
cingulate activity, and reduced activity in the inferior pontine
tegmentum and the right lentiform nucleus.
Tom Bohr, Associate Professor of Neurology at the Loma Linda
University, California, summarised the atheist's point of view by
saying that the field is an enormous tautology, possibly doomed
from the start. He reviewed much of the world literature,
pointing out that the methodology was at fault, there was often
failure to report power calculations, failure to state an a priori
sample size, inappropriate controls, and other factors. Even
those studies with apparent statistical significance often had a
good deal of overlap and no obvious biologic significance. Those
studies purporting to show neuro-imaging differences often had a
very small number of patients and inadequate controls. The fact
that ankylosing spondylitis patients report function that
dovetails with the independent observer’s impression was pointed
out in contrast to fibromyalgia where perceived lack of function
was strikingly different from observed function. In terms of the
inter-relationship between psycho-pathology and pain, the debate
continues as to whether the former is secondary to the latter, or
vice versa. His reading of the literature suggested that
psycho-pathology comes first.
Those studies purporting to reveal a link between trauma and
fibromyalgia were often flawed by inadequate attention to the
background epidemiology, the number of traumatised patients,
absence of long-term follow up, and other problems. He also spoke
about primary gain from the point of view of the patient,
secondary gain, and even, of course, tertiary gain whereby at
least in litigation lawyers and physicians benefit more than the
patients.
I spoke of the link, or lack thereof, between trauma and
fibromyalgia. I focused on the background epidemiology, pointing
out how easy it is for the unwary to fall into the trap of
believing that because "a" preceded "b", "a" caused "b", and
commented on the vicious cycle of pain with increasing pain,
decreasing function, and increasing anxiety. The impact of
litigation was discussed at length.
EVOLVING COURT RULES IN BRITAIN
Ian Goldrein, an attorney from London (Queens Counsel), gave a
brilliant and colourful presentation regarding the evolving Court
rules in Britain, and what is expected of the expert witness and
how easily such an individual can be destroyed by an intelligent
lawyer! Norman Cottington from the Bodily Injury Claims Management
Association, England, spoke about the Association representing a
body of Claimant and Defendant Solicitors Insurers and
re-insurers. Certainly, this sounded something like a social
Utopia, whereby the focus was on rehabilitation and "best
practice" codes ensuring that the patient/plaintiff remains the
focus of attention to the benefit of the patient and society. The
philosophy behind this group is that the more money spent on
rehabilitating the patient and the less on medico-legal expenses,
the better for the individual and society.
Charles Pither, Pain Specialist from INPUT, St Thomas’ Hospital,
London, gave an historical review and reminded us that Victorians
suffered from "fibrositis" or a similar condition while others
were labelled as having neurasthenia. He concluded that the
inexorable increase in incidence and severity of fibromyalgia is
largely due to cultural and psychosocial features fuelled by
medicalisation of the problem. From his perspective, treatment
should focus on self-management and maintenance of function.
COMPENSATION AND THE SOCIO-POLITICAL ISSUES
Nortin Hadler, from the University of North Carolina, spoke of
compensation and the socio-political issues surrounding
fibromyalgia. Inevitably, his presentation was erudite and
believed by half the audience and disbelieved by the other half.
He concluded by saying that "Participating as a physician in the
disability determination process is an act of iatrogenecity. It is
time to dismantle the sophistry. Only then do alternatives reveal
themselves."
COMMENT:
The 3 days were well worthwhile in terms of having fine
presentations from most of the major protagonists and antagonists
around the world. At the end of the day, we still do not know why
the vast majority of patients are Caucasian and most of the
subjects are women. We have no good feel of whether the condition
is becoming more prevalent or whether we are simply diagnosing it
more frequently. Although we know a great deal more about chronic
pain, we remain uncertain where fibromyalgia fits in. Much of the
neuro-hormonal aberrant function could be either causative or a
result of the pain. More studies should be done.
Overall, it was particularly appealing to have discussion not
simply between rheumatologists, but between rheumatologists,
orthopaedic surgeons, pain management specialists, patients,
neurobiologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and lawyers
together with ergonomic specialists, car manufacturers, and
insurers! |